What do you think? Consider the tone he uses, and how he presents both sides of the issue. what are his values? Does he share the same values as Palin and those who think like her? Does he define the issue the way that a person who agrees with Palin's socially-conservative platform might actually define the issue, or is he interpreting her position through his own? Explain.
Thank Stephanie Osborn for this one!
MR R
1 comment:
The rhetorical strategy used in the above article, by the way, is called "paramologia," it has to do with conceding a weaker point in order to make a stronger point.
Post a Comment